Teal vs Huntr (2026): Which Job Tracker App Is Actually Worth Using?

If you are managing more than ten job applications at once, a spreadsheet stops working. The Teal vs Huntr debate is where most organised job seekers land, and both tools promise to solve the same core problem: track your applications, tailor your resume, and stay on top of follow-ups without losing track of where you stand.

But they go about it very differently. Teal is a resume-first platform with a tracker attached. Huntr is a tracker-first platform with resume tools attached. That distinction matters more than any individual feature comparison.

In this guide, we tested both tools against real Australian job search workflows. You will get an honest, unsponsored verdict, a clear decision framework, and a straight answer for your specific situation.

Already organised and ready to apply? Browse AI-matched Australian roles on CloudColleague across tech, admin, health, trades, and more. Thousands of verified employers are hiring right now.Browse open roles on CloudColleague

Teal vs Huntr: What Each Tool Is Actually Built For?

Before comparing features, it helps to understand the philosophy behind each platform. This is the question most comparison articles skip, and it is the most important one.

Teal is built around resume optimisation and ATS keyword matching. The job tracker is genuinely capable, but the real value proposition is helping you tailor your resume to each specific job description, quickly and systematically. Every workflow in Teal points toward the application document.

Huntr is built around visual pipeline management with a contact CRM layer underneath. The resume tools work well for fast iteration, but the standout experience is the Kanban board that shows your entire job search at a glance. Every workflow in Huntr points toward application volume and pipeline visibility.

This fundamental difference determines which tool fits which job seeker. Keep it in mind as you read the comparison below.

Teal Review: What It Does Well and Where It Falls Short?

We tested Teal across the full job search workflow: saving roles, tailoring resumes, tracking applications, and managing follow-ups. Here is what we found.

Teal’s Standout Features

Teal’s Chrome extension is one of the smoothest job-saving experiences available. One click from a LinkedIn, SEEK, or Indeed listing captures the job title, company, description, and URL directly into your tracker. The saved job description then powers Teal’s AI resume tailoring feature, which compares your resume against the role and surfaces the specific keywords you are missing.

That ATS keyword gap analysis is Teal’s genuine differentiator. It shows you not just that keywords are missing, but where in your resume to add them and how much weight each term carries in the job description. For job seekers who take a careful, targeted approach to applications, this is a meaningful edge over tools that offer generic resume scoring.

The free tier is also genuinely usable. Unlimited job tracking with application status management costs nothing, which means you can run your entire search inside Teal without spending a dollar on the tracking side.

Other standout features include:

• A clean weekly activity dashboard that shows applications sent, responses received, and follow-up tasks due
• ATS-compatible resume templates that are formatted correctly out of the box
• Resume version management so you can store tailored versions for different role types without losing earlier drafts

Where Teal Falls Short?

Teal’s AI-generated bullet points are the platform’s most visible weakness. The suggestions are structurally correct, following the achievement plus metric plus impact formula, but they often read as generic. You will spend meaningful time editing AI output to make it sound like you rather than like a resume template.

The checklist-driven workflow is also time-consuming for high-volume job searches. Teal guides you through a thorough review process for each application, which is valuable when you are applying strategically to a small number of targeted roles. When you are firing off twenty applications a week, the same process starts to feel like friction rather than help.

Additionally, Teal has no autofill feature. You still manually complete every application form on every employer’s website. For job seekers spending significant time on Workday and Greenhouse forms, this is a real productivity gap.

Contact tracking and networking management is also basic. If your job search involves building relationships with hiring managers and recruiters alongside submitting applications, Teal’s contact features will not be enough.

Huntr Review: What It Does Well and Where It Falls Short

We put Huntr through the same workflow testing. Here is the honest assessment.

Huntr’s Standout Features

The Kanban board is Huntr’s strongest feature and the reason most visual thinkers prefer it over Teal. You can see every application across every stage simultaneously: saved, applied, phone screen, interview, offer, and rejected. Moving a card between columns takes one drag. The visibility this gives you over an active job search is genuinely difficult to replicate with a list-based interface.

The contact CRM layer underneath the tracker is Huntr’s second major advantage. Each application has its own contact section where you log the recruiter’s name, the hiring manager, anyone you have spoken to, and notes from those conversations. For networking-heavy job searches, this replaces a separate CRM tool entirely.

Huntr’s Chrome extension goes further than Teal’s by including autofill capability. It can pre-populate application fields on Workday, Greenhouse, and other employer portals with your saved information. For job seekers applying to many roles simultaneously, this alone saves a meaningful amount of time each week.

Other standout features include:

• A mobile app that is more capable than Teal’s web-only experience, useful for logging applications and checking pipeline on the go
• Fast AI resume rewrites that prioritise iteration speed over deep analysis
• Job match feedback that gives a quick directional score without requiring a full checklist review

Where Huntr Falls Short?

Huntr’s ATS keyword matching is noticeably less precise than Teal’s. The job match score gives you a directional read, but it does not surface the specific keywords you are missing or guide you on where to place them in your resume. If keyword gap analysis is important to your strategy, Huntr does not replace Teal on this dimension.

The free plan caps at 100 job applications. For most active searches this is sufficient, but job seekers running extended searches of several months can hit this limit. At that point, upgrading to the paid plan at $30 per month becomes necessary.

Resume template variety is also more limited than Teal’s, and the structured guidance through each application stage is less thorough. Job seekers who want step-by-step process support will find Teal’s workflow more helpful.

Tracking applications is only half the job. Make sure you are applying to the right roles. Get AI-matched to verified Australian jobs on CloudColleague. Create a free profile and find roles that actually fit your experience.Start as a job seeker on CloudColleague

Teal vs Huntr: Head-to-Head Feature Comparison

Here is how both tools compare across the nine criteria that matter most to Australian job seekers.

Neither tool sweeps the board. Consequently, the decision comes down to your job search style rather than which platform has more features overall.

Pricing: What the Free Plans Actually Give You?

Both tools market generous free tiers. Here is what you actually get before hitting a paywall.

Teal Free Plan: The Reality

Teal’s free tier is genuinely useful for job tracking. Unlimited applications with status management, the Chrome extension for job saving, and basic keyword gap analysis are all available at no cost. You can run a complete job search inside Teal’s tracker without spending anything.

The paywall hits when you need AI features heavily. Resume downloads in PDF format, full AI resume tailoring credits, and advanced keyword analysis are restricted on the free tier. If you plan to use Teal primarily as a tracker and do your resume work elsewhere, the free plan covers you well. If you want the full AI-powered tailoring experience, you are looking at $9 per week or around $29 per month for Teal Plus.

Huntr Free Plan: The Reality

Huntr’s free plan is more feature-rich at sign-up. You get the Kanban tracker for up to 100 applications, the Chrome extension including autofill, contact management, unlimited base resumes with basic job matching, and limited AI resume tailoring to test the platform.

The 100-application cap is the main constraint. For a focused three-month search, this is usually enough. For extended searches or high-volume appliers, you will need the paid plan at $30 per month for unlimited tracking and full AI features.

Both free plans are worth testing before committing to either paid subscription. The workflows feel meaningfully different in practice, and the right choice becomes clearer after a week of real use.

Which Tool Should You Choose? A Clear Decision Framework

Here is a direct guide based on your job search situation.

Choose Teal If:

• Your biggest bottleneck is tailoring your resume to each job description and ensuring ATS keyword coverage
• You apply to a focused number of roles with careful targeting rather than high volume
• You want structured, step-by-step guidance through the research and application process
• A real-time ATS keyword match score per application is important to your strategy
• You prefer a checklist-driven, methodical workflow over a visual pipeline board

Choose Huntr If:

• You are applying at high volume and need to move quickly between many applications simultaneously
• Your job search is networking-heavy and you need to track contacts, recruiters, and conversations alongside each application
• You want a visual Kanban pipeline that shows your entire search status at a glance
• Autofill on Workday and Greenhouse forms would save you meaningful time each week
• You want a capable mobile app for tracking and updating applications on the go

Consider Neither If:

This is the option no competitor article mentions, but it is the right answer for a significant portion of job seekers.

If you are applying to fewer than ten roles and your search is focused and deliberate, a well-structured spreadsheet delivers equivalent visibility at zero cost and zero learning curve. Google Sheets with columns for company, role title, date applied, application status, contact name, and follow-up date handles most casual searches without additional tooling.

Alternatively, if you are using CloudColleague as your primary job search platform, the built-in application management within the platform already centralises much of what Teal and Huntr solve. You apply, track your application status, and communicate with employers in one place. Adding a third-party tracker on top of a platform that already manages this creates unnecessary duplication.

What Australian Job Seekers Specifically Need to Know?

Both tools were built primarily for the US job market, and this shows in some areas. Here is what is relevant and what is not for Australian job seekers specifically.

Both Chrome extensions support SEEK job saving, which is the most important compatibility for the Australian market. Saving roles from SEEK into either tracker works reliably and is one of the most used workflows for Australian users of both platforms.

Huntr’s autofill capability works on Workday and Greenhouse application forms. Many large Australian employers across banking, consulting, technology, and resources sectors use these platforms, so this feature does save meaningful time in the Australian context.

Neither tool is integrated with CloudColleague’s job listings natively, but both Chrome extensions can capture CloudColleague tasks postings into their trackers for candidates who want to manage their full search across multiple platforms in one dashboard.

USD pricing applies to both platforms. At current exchange rates, Huntr’s $40 per month paid plan converts to approximately AUD $46 per month. Teal’s $13 per week  converts similarly. Factor this into your budget assessment.

Applications tracked and resume tailored. Now find Australian roles worth applying to. Create a free verified profile on CloudColleague and get AI-matched to employers actively hiring in your field right now.Get started free on CloudColleague

Hiring and need to find the right people fast? Post a role or task in under five minutes on CloudColleague. Smart matching surfaces pre-vetted candidates. No agency fees, no long wait.Start hiring on CloudColleague

Frequently Asked Questions